2022 ACLCA PCR Guidance – Process and Methods Toolkit

Creating Standardized, Consistent, and Reliable PCRs & EPDs for Transparency, Procurement, and Supply Chain Data

NEW! Open for Public Comment: Renewable Energy Addendum to the ACLCA PCR Open Standard

ACLCA is looking for your review and comments for the Renewable Energy Addendum by December 2, 2022. Access the documents HERE. Use the Public Comment Form HERE

READ PRESS RELEASE HERE

WATCH THE REPLAY OF THE WEBINAR HERE

JOIN THE PROGRAM OPERATOR USER GROUP COMMUNICATIONS

With the increasing demand for using ISO Type III environmental declarations (EPDs) to communicate the potential environmental impacts of products and processes, EPDs are also being used to inform design and procurement decisions (The White House 2021, Buy Clean California 2021, Buy Clean Colorado 2021).

This presents the critical need to create EPDs that are ISO standards-conformant, consistent with life cycle assessment (LCA) best practices and that enable digital communication with construction, accounting, and other reporting tools.

To that end, there is an urgency to create technical frameworks that support industry wide protocols for developing high quality product category rules (PCRs). Assuring the quality of PCRs will ensure that EPD results can reliably inform decision-making.

Published in 2013, the American Center for Life Cycle Assessment (ACLCA) PCR Guidance Development document (Ingwersen and Subramanian, 2013) has been the leading reference for program operators’ PCR development process in North America.

This 2022 version reflects the progress in the use of EPDs and program operators’ experience over the past 9 years. The work to develop this update has been in process since 2018 including outcome of many stakeholder workshops and formal reviews including the ACLCA PCR committee reviews in 2020-21, and a formal public review in 2022.

2022 ACLCA PCR Guidance_ Process and Methods Toolkit

2-Part Tool: Process (checklists) + Methods & Methodologies (Addenda) Download >

Process checklists (.xls) Download >

Methods & Methodology Addenda

Following is the list of currently identified topics. Working groups have been created to complete these and others as future requirements are identified.

Published

Allocating Burdens and Benefits of Materials Shared Across Product Systems Download >
Assessing Data Quality of Background Life Cycle Inventory Datasets Download >
In development
Industry-wide EPD Benchmarking
Circular Scenarios (Module D)
Biogenic Carbon Accounting
Renewable Energy Accounting - OPEN FOR PUBLIC COMMENT UNTIL DECEMBER 2, 2022
EPD Comparability and Digital EPDs / Open EPD
EPD Comparability Disclaimer Text
Buy Clean Legislation
Types of EPDs

Interested in participating in an addendum working group or suggesting a topic?

Contact ACLCA PCR Committee Co-chairs:

Mandy Montazeri, TrueNorth Collective, [email protected]

Hao Cai, Argonne National Lab, [email protected]

Stay up to date. Sign up for updates, news and events here.

Watch the Replay - 2022 ACLCA PCR Guidance- Process and Methods Toolkit Webinar here.

2013 ACLCA PCR Guidance

PCR Guidance Development

The Guidance Product Category Rule Development (PCR Guidance) is a global guidance document that extends upon existing standards to provide more guidance for developing the rules upon which product claims are based. Version 1.0 was developed by an international initiative, ‘Product Category Rule Guidance Development Initiative’ and published in August 2013. See the ‘History’ for more background information.

The ACLCA PCR committee is entrusted with the stewardship and further development of the PCR Guidance.

Download PCR Guidance Document

Product Claims Standards

The Guidance is intended to supplement and/or align with the following standards and guidance documents:

I. ISO 14025 and other Type III Standards, including:

ISO 14025: 2006 – Environmental labels and declarations – Type III environmental declarations – Principles and procedures (ISO)
BP X30-323-0: 2011 – Principes généraux pour l’affichage environnemental des produits de grande consummation (AFNOR, France)
CEN 15804: 2008 – Sustainability of construction works – Environmental product declarations – Product category rules (CEN, Europe)
ISO 21930 Sustainability in building construction – Environmental declaration of building products
Product Environmental Footprint Guide (European Commission Joint Research Centre, 2013)

II. All Program Operator Rules based on ISO 14025

III. Product Carbon Footprint Standards and other Single-Criteria LCA-based standards, such as:

Greenhouse Gas Product Accounting and Reporting Standard (GHG Protocol, 2011)
PAS 2050 – Specification for the assessment of the life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of goods and services (BSI, 2011)
TS Q 0010 – General Principles for the Assessment and Labeling of Carbon Footprint of Products (JEMAI, Japan, 2009)

IV. Other Standards or Guidance

ISO 14020: 2000 Environmental labels and declarations – General principles
ISO 14021: 1999 Environmental labels and declarations – Self-declared environmental claims (Type II environmental labeling)
ISO 14040: 2006 Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Principles and framework
ISO 14044: 2006 Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Requirements and guidelines
ISO 14050: 2006 Environmental management – Vocabulary
ISO 17024: 2003 Conformity assessment – General requirements for bodies operating certification of persons

Participating Organizations

There are 55 participants from 44 organizations in this collaborative group effort. The participating organizations are listed below:

American Center for Life Cycle Assessment/US
Association of LCA in Latin America
Athena Sustainable Materials Institute/CA
Business and Institutional Furniture Manufacturers Association International/US
Canadian Standards Association/CA
Chilean Network of LCA/CL
CIRAIG/CA
CLIOPE/AR
Dow Chemical Company/US
EcoGlobal/CR
European Commission Directorate General for Environment/EU
European Commission Joint Research Centre/EU
Five Winds International
FP Innovations/CA
French Ministry of Sustainable Development/FR
Georgia-Pacific/US
GreenDelta/DE
Harvard University/US
Herman Miller/US
Ibero-American Network of LCA
Industrial Ecology Consultants/US
Interface/US
Japanese Environmental Management Association for Industry/JP
Kimball International/US
New Earth/US
NSF International/US
PE International
PRé Sustainability
Quantis/US
Scientific Certification Systems/US
SGS North America/US
Sustainable Solutions Corporation/US
Swedish Environmental Management Council/SE
Swiss Federal Office for the Environment/FOEN
The Carbon Trust/GB
The International EPD System/SE
UL Environment/US
UNEP/SETAC Life Cycle Initiative
Unilever/GB
University of Calgary/CA
University of Washington/US
US Environmental Protection Agency
World Resources Institute/US
World Wildlife Fund/US
Xerox/US

Location: USA

Website

ZAG

Industry: Building and Construction materials

Location: Slovenia

Website

History

PCR Guidance Development Initiative History

The increasing demand for Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) based product declarations, such as Environmental Product Declarations (EPDs) and Product Environmental Footprints, have generated a corresponding need for rules for making comparable declarations of products within the same category. These rules are defined as Product Category Rules (PCRs) in ISO 14025, Product Rules in the GHG Protocol Product Life Cycle Accounting and Reporting Standard, Supplementary Requirements in PAS 2050, and Product Footprint Category Rules in the DRAFT European Commission Product Carbon Footprint Standard. Other standards such as BP X30 (France), SMRS (Sustainability Consortium), TS 0100 (Japan), and the forthcoming ISO 14067 also require the use of PCRs for making comparative product declarations. Thus far, the development of PCRs has taken place independently by various programs using one of the above-mentioned standards. As a result, there is no strong consensus on how to develop sound and consistent PCRs, nor is there a productive cross-recognition of PCRs between various programs. People working in the arena of LCA-based product comparisons have long realized the need to advance these standards to maintain a certain level of consistency.

Through discussions in multi-stakeholder organizations such as the PCF World Forum’s PCR Roundtable and Taskforce, the American Center for LCA PCR Committee, and workshops such as the PCR Alignment Special Session in the LCA XI conference, it has become clear that more guidance on the development of PCRs could benefit all parties involved and help improve the legitimacy of the product declarations. In response to this need, in December 2011 the American Center for LCA PCR Committee created a subcommittee to initiate a collaborative effort to develop a PCR guidance document. The Product Category Rule Guidance Development Initiative was launched in early 2012 under the premise that the Guidance would be the shared product of all organizations wishing to take part in its development, and that it would be international and voluntary. This Guidance is the product of the aforementioned Initiative. List of participating organizations.

By providing additional instructions, the Guidance

Purports that a single PCR can be used by various ISO 14044-compliant standards for product claims
Establishes a consistent document structure for PCRs that are required by various product claim standards
Provides consistency in the content that is included in PCRs
Fills gaps in guidance on PCRs by conforming with ISO 14040/44 and is based on other standards, peer-reviewed journal articles, guides, or program rules
Provides clarity in the level of detail of the content included in PCRs
Reduces cost and time required to develop a PCR, often by supporting the adaption of an existing PCR
Reduces confusion and frustration when creating PCRs that are based on standards and/or programs that are lacking in sufficient guidance
Improves the chances of comparability of claims across programs using the same product claim standard
Introduces visionary thinking by pushing the boundaries for improving PCR creation and use
Suggests means of improving the visibility of PCRs and program operators which will help reduce PCR duplicity

In seeking to fulfill its purpose, the Guidance

Uses ISO 14040 and ISO 14044 as the basis for alignment
Treats all product claim standards equally, while adopting the terminology and principles of ISO 14025 – the first and most thorough product claim standard that defines PCRs
Does not intend to supersede the instructions provided in any product claim standard or program instructions
Is setting the stage for the use of LCA-based product claims in decision making
Directly uses, paraphrases, or modifies some content from some standards for the sake of addressing insufficiency in other product claim standards

The Guidance IS NOT INTENDED TO do the following:

Pre-empt the development of ISO 14025 or other LCA-based product claim standards
Act as a standard by itself
Preclude application to any LCA-based standards and programs
Promote or advantage any particular program or program operator

For more information, see the following publications:

Ingwersen W, Subramanian V (2013) Guidance for product category rule development: process, outcome, and next steps. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. [LINK]

Subramanian, V., Ingwersen, W., Collie, H., Hensler, C. (2012) Comparison of Product Category Rules: Learned Outcomes Towards Global Alignment. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 17: 892-903 [LINK].

Ingwersen, W., Subramanian, V., Schenck, R., Costello, A., Thoma, G., Lahd, H., Bushi, L., Ryding, S-O., Tam, L., East, C. (2011) Product category rules alignment workshop, October 4, 2011 ,in Chicago, IL, USA. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 17 (2):258-263. [LINK]

Ingwersen, W. W., and Stevenson, M. (2012) Can we compare the environmental performance of this product to that one? An update on the development of product category rules and future challenges toward alignment, Journal of Cleaner Production, 24: 102-108. [LINK]

Building capacity, driving development & connecting the LCA Community